🔗 Share this article

For a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the baseball championship did not happen during the tense finale last Saturday, when her team pulled off one death-defying escape act after another before winning in overtime over the opposing team.

It came in the previous game, when two second-tier players, Kike Hernández and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a electrifying, game-winning sequence that at the same time upended numerous harmful stereotypes touted about Latinos in recent decades.

The play itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from left field to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then threw it to second base to secure another, game-winning play. Rojas, positioned nearby, caught the ball moments before a opposing player barreled into him, sending him backwards.

This wasn't just a remarkable sporting achievement, perhaps the decisive turn in momentum in the Dodgers' favor after appearing for most of the series like the weaker side. For Molina, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a much-required morale boost for Latinos and for Los Angeles after a period of immigration raids, troops patrolling the streets, and a steady stream of negativity from national leaders.

"The players presented this alternative story," explained the professor. "The world witnessed Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being leaders on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of masculinity. They're energetic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – raids, Latinos detained and pursued. It's so easy to be demoralized these days."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a team supporter nowadays – for Molina or for the many of other Latinos who show up faithfully to matches and fill up as many as half of the venue's 50,000 seats per game.

The Complicated Relationship with the Team

After intensified enforcement operations started in Los Angeles in June, and national guard troops were deployed into the city to react to resulting protests, two of the city's soccer clubs promptly released messages of support with immigrant families – while the Dodgers.

The team president stated the Dodgers prefer to stay away of politics – a stance influenced, perhaps, by the reality that a significant portion of the supporters, even Latinos, are followers of current leaders. Under significant public pressure, the organization later pledged $1m in aid for individuals directly affected by the operations but issued no official condemnation of the government.

Official Event and Historical Legacy

Three months before, the team did not delay in agreeing to an offer to mark their 2024 championship victory at the official residence – a decision that sports columnists described as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", given the Dodgers' boast in having been the first major league franchise to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that legacy and the values it represents by executives and present and former athletes. A number of team members such as the coach had expressed unwillingness to travel to the event during the first term but then changed their minds or succumbed to demands from team management.

Business Ownership and Supporter Dilemmas

An additional complication for fans is that the team are owned by a large investment group, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, as per sources and its own published balance sheets, involve a stake in a private prison company that runs detention centers. Guggenheim's leadership has said repeatedly that it wants to remain neutral of political matters, but its detractors say the silence – and the investment – are their own type of compliance to certain policies.

All of that add up to considerable mixed feelings among Latino fans in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the euphoria of this year's hard-won World Series victory and the following outpouring of team pride across the city.

"Can one to root for the Dodgers?" local writer one observer reflected at the start of the playoffs in an thoughtful article pondering on "team loyalty in our blood, but uncertainty in our hearts". Galindo couldn't finally bring himself to view the World Series, but he still felt deeply, to the point that he decided his one-man protest must have given the team the fortune it required to win.

Distinguishing the Players from the Management

Numerous fans who share Galindo's reservations seem to have concluded that they can continue to support the team and its lineup of global players, featuring the Asian megastar a key player, while expressing disdain on the team's corporate leadership. At no place was this more evident than at the victory celebration at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the packed audience roared in support of the manager and his athletes but jeered the executive and the top official of the investors.

"These men in suits do not get to take our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the team longer than they have."

Historical Context and Community Impact

The problem, though, goes further than only the team's current owners. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the 1950s involved the municipality razing three working-class Latino communities on a hill above downtown and then selling the land to the organization for a small part of its actual worth. A track on a 2005 album that documents the events has an impoverished worker at the stadium revealing that the house he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, possibly southern California most widely followed Latino writer and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the long, problematic dynamic between the team and its audience. He calls the team the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for decades.

"They have acted around Latino fans while profiting from them with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer noted over the warmer months, when demands to boycott the organization over its absence of reaction to the enforcement actions were upended by the awkward fact that turnout at matches did not dip, even at the height of the protests when the city center was subject to a nightly curfew.

International Stars and Fan Connections

Separating the squad from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {